Which Fantasy App Is Legal in Karnataka

Which Fantasy App Is Legal in Karnataka

12 December, 2022 0 Comments

Meanwhile, Dream11 has also let its followers down by not responding to news about the state of the fantastic app in Karnataka. Several tweets asking for clarification after the ban was imposed went unanswered. Industry sources told Outlook on Friday that Dream11 “has obtained explicit legal advice from a prestigious former Supreme Court justice to continue operating in states that have banned online gambling with stakes.” “By the way, who advises Dream11 to stay open in Karnataka? Is it possible that they have a government agreement that allows them to operate and not abide by the law? ” said a senior official of a major operator on condition of anonymity. An FIR has been launched against Dream11 for running their fantasy sports app, even though Karnataka bans online games with stakes (money). Dream11 is a partner of the Board of Control for cricket in India and sponsors the Indian Premier League, which is currently taking place in the United Arab Emirates. (More news on cricket) Also dismissed the complaint, since it is still online, people can go there and bet on fantasy cricket where they risk losing large sums of money, which will allow Dream 11 owners to illegally accumulate wealth from a banned source. Jay Satya, a lawyer who specializes in technology and gaming, said it is this distinction that finds the Karnataka government`s ban unconstitutional. “The skill and gambling are different, which has already been decided by the Supreme Court. Once something is classified as a game of skill, it no longer falls within the scope of the game, and games of skill enjoy the constitutional protection of commerce and industry under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution,” he said.

Instead of such bans, industry stakeholders have called on state governments to take regulatory action in the area of online fantasy gaming. Dinker Vashisht, Vice President of Corporate and Regulatory Affairs at Games24x7, said: “This is the third Supreme Court decision in the last seven months to impose a ban on games of skill as ultra vires (or against the legal scope) of the Constitution. We hope these decisions can push state governments to shape progressive policy and regulatory structures for this emerging sector. Games24x7 and AIGF were both among the petitioners against the Karnataka state government`s decision in the State Supreme Court. While Games24x7 offers Rummy Circle and My 11 Circle as two fantastic gaming platforms in rummy and cricket, AIGF represents several companies in this industry. All competitions offered by Howzat are games of skill, as the success of participants in these games/competitions depends mainly on their superior knowledge of cricket and/or football and/or kabaddi statistics, knowledge of the relative form of the players, the performance of the players in a particular field, the conditions of play and/or the format (such as ODIs, Test Cricket and Twenty20 in fantasy cricket). Attention and commitment to the competitions in which they participate and ability to play the competitions. Competitions also require participants to field balanced teams with limited resources and make substitutions at appropriate times to achieve the highest score.

Online sporting events have catapulted the growth of these platforms, and the segment`s revenue potential is clearly visible to industry players. The lack of clear understanding of these platforms has left them vulnerable to legal motions, which were first filed with the Supreme Court last year. The deal is far from done. The Tamil Nadu government is now knocking on the doors of the Supreme Court to clarify the issue and once again ban the operation of online gambling companies. In this respect, things still need to move. The dissenting opinion raises concerns about the future of fantasy sports in India. Andhra Pradesh in 2020 did not give a clear reason, but it was reported that the paid platform for online gambling was under scrutiny under the latest amendment to the Gambling Act. Dream 11 also came to this area and users noticed changes in the app. The All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) and companies such as MPL, Games 24×7 (which includes RummyCircle and My11 Circle, among others) have challenged the law and appealed to the Supreme Court.

Dream11 launched its fantasy cricket app in Karnataka when other prominent operators like MPL, Paytm, My11Circle resigned after the government ban. @Dream11 Is the ban of Dream 11 in Karnataka please confrim. “Members are strongly advised to consult their legal counsel when deciding to continue offering paid variants of fantastic sports in the state of Karnataka in light of the changes. We will continue to monitor related legal developments. The ban has overshadowed the burgeoning online fantasy sports sector, which has attracted millions of dollars in investment. Surprisingly, according to the report, Dream11 is still active for gamers today. In a previous report, an industry source revealed in an interview with Reuters that Karnataka is one of many important states for fantasy sports skill gaming space, accounting for 20 percent of total business activity. The Dream11 app still allowed Karnataka users to play fantastic games on Saturday. The state government had recently amended the Karnataka Police Act of 1963, which now prohibits online gambling and skills involving money in any form. From now on, players from Karnataka should be able to access all of the above online platforms in the coming days, which will allow them to participate in various fantasy sports tournaments and have the chance to win nice cash rewards again. Roland Landers, Chief Executive of the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), added: “This is a step in the right direction to develop the gaming industry in the state and will help unlock the economic potential of this sector. We look forward to working with the government and stakeholders to develop a clear regulatory framework that will allow legitimate gambling companies to operate in the state with safeguards while banning illegal state gambling apps.

The legal interpretation of the Karnataka Police Amendment Act 2021 appears to be a fundamental mystery. The implementation of the law is an even bigger issue, as it has been observed that governments can be “selective” and turn a blind eye to some companies that choose to flout the rules. Instead of copying the standard response, can you at least read the message and use brains? This is not a custom issue for which I need to register a request. This is a generic query for all d11 users in Karnataka. So stop being an idiot and respond. These types of requests are not new to the high courts. On 4 August, after lengthy deliberations, the Madras Supreme Court struck down the Tamil Nadu Gambling and Police Laws (Amendment) Act 2021, which sought to ban online gambling with stakes. Despite the legal setback, Tamil Nadu is desperately trying to come up with a well-maintained new project. Karnataka could face a similar legal battle, as most law-abiding operators continue to be stunned by the whims and fantasies of state governments. Meanwhile, the All India Gaming Federation and several other companies have turned to the Karnataka High Court to protest the ban. The AIGF has poker, rummy and fantasy operators among its members, including MPL, Paytm, Gamezy, 11wickets, Nostragamus et al.

On 5. In October 2021, the state government notified the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act 2021, which makes all forms of gambling associated with virtual or physical stakes, including online gambling and games of skill, an ineligible offence. Games of skill are legally classified as those that require human knowledge to be exceeded and are different from those based solely on luck. According to the FIR, dropped off at Annapoorneshwarinagar police station on Friday by a Manjunath, a resident of Nagarbhavi in Bangalore, Bhavit Sheth and Harsh Jain, the founders and directors of Sporta Technologies Private Limited, which promotes the gaming app Dream11, were retained as defendants number one and two.

About the Author